Performance Scores for Selected Government Services, by Jurisdiction Click to View

General Government Services (1) N (3) Mean (2) Median Std. Deviation Skewness Road maintenance 599 2.94 3.00 1.092 -0.087 Revitalizing older neighborhoods 578 2.57 3.00 1.090 0.305 Flood control 572 3.48 4.00 1.096 -0.442 Budget management 589 2.56 3.00 1.125 0.208 Communicate Clark County's views about Yucca Mountain to federal decision makers 572 2.82 3.00 1.243 0.138 Monitor and report to the public on how well government services are being performed 585 2.50 3.00 1.049 0.335 Parks and recreation programs 588 3.52 4.00 1.165 -0.583 Water conservation programs 592 3.22 3.00 1.213 -0.350 1) Ranking: Excellent (1), Good (2), Fair (3) and Poor (4);" 2) Mean is the average score reported from all respondents; and 3) N represents the number of observations.

Social and Judicial Services (1) N (3) Mean (2) Median Std. Deviation Skewness Providing child protection services 580 2.84 3.00 1.068 0.056 Providing child welfare services 576 2.79 3.00 1.050 0.136 Providing juvenile justice services 577 2.83 3.00 1.084 0.021 Providing attainable housing for working class families 574 2.52 3.00 1.042 0.286 Providing affordable housing for low income families 575 2.41 2.00 1.079 0.434 Providing shelter for the homeless 585 2.19 2.00 1.120 0.644 Providing affordable housing for seniors 577 2.62 3.00 1.123 0.261 Providing medical care for the poor 583 2.59 3.00 1.213 0.272 Providing 24 hour emergency trauma care 578 3.26 3.00 1.229 -0.323 1) Ranking: Excellent (1), Good (2), Fair (3) and Poor (4);" 2) Mean is the average score reported from all respondents; and 3) N represents the number of observations.

Public Safety (1) N (3) Mean (2) Median Std. Deviation Skewness Providing crime prevention programs 583 3.04 3.00 1.018 -0.179 Enforcing traffic laws 596 2.99 3.00 1.181 -0.086 Maintaining a low crime rate 590 2.82 3.00 1.078 0.068 Maintaining neighborhood police patrols 587 2.73 3.00 1.170 0.171 Keeping police response times low 572 3.09 3.00 1.192 -0.248 Keeping fire department response times low 576 3.73 4.00 1.037 -0.756 Keeping paramedic and emergency medical response times low 581 3.83 4.00 1.012 -0.836 Well trained paramedic and emergency medical response personnel 580 3.93 4.00 0.989 -0.919 Facilitate neighborhood watch programs 575 2.80 3.00 1.117 0.135 Preparing for natural disasters (i.e. floods, earthquakes, etc.) 579 2.99 3.00 1.138 -0.061 Preparing for man made (such as hazardous or radiological materials) accidents and terrorist events 576 2.95 3.00 1.147 -0.010 Investigating criminal activity 578 3.14 3.00 1.105 -0.131 Providing fire protection and prevention services 579 3.65 4.00 1.017 -0.454 Providing emergency medical services 579 3.77 4.00 1.020 -0.698 Providing neighborhood code enforcement services 583 3.01 3.00 1.154 -0.059 Examining potential impacts from Yucca Mountain nuclear waste shipments 573 2.79 3.00 1.265 0.083 Regional justice services and facilities 581 3.07 3.00 1.110 -0.215 1) Ranking: Excellent (1), Good (2), Fair (3) and Poor (4);" 2) Mean is the average score reported from all respondents; and 3) N represents the number of observations.

Community Development (1) N (3) Mean (2) Median Std. Deviation Skewness Providing affordable housing 573 2.55 3.00 1.087 0.235 Managing growth 588 2.47 2.00 1.221 0.397 Increasing job opportunities 583 2.91 3.00 1.155 0.027 Improving the business climate 581 3.16 3.00 1.078 -0.217 Planning for commercial development 578 3.22 3.00 1.163 -0.259 Reducing traffic congestion 591 2.43 2.00 1.201 0.494 Access to freeways 588 3.09 3.00 1.173 -0.132 Improving road conditions 596 2.90 3.00 1.172 -0.011 Reducing travel time 587 2.57 3.00 1.106 0.235 Providing mass public transit 581 2.70 3.00 1.286 0.241 Adequate airport facilities 585 3.38 3.00 1.164 -0.428 1) Ranking: Excellent (1), Good (2), Fair (3) and Poor (4);" 2) Mean is the average score reported from all respondents; and 3) N represents the number of observations.

Performance Frequency Tables

Please rate the performance of government in providing the following services on a scale of one to five, where one means "poor" and five means "excellent": Road maintenance Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 47 7.8 7.8 7.8 4 128 21.4 21.4 29.2 3 241 40.2 40.3 69.5 2 110 18.4 18.4 87.9 1 72 12.1 12.1 100.0 Total 599 99.8 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 1 .2 Total 600 100.0   Please rate the performance of government in providing the following services on a scale of one to five, where one means "poor" and five means "excellent": Revitalizing older neighborhoods Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 29 4.8 5.0 5.0 4 80 13.3 13.8 18.8 3 187 31.2 32.4 51.1 2 177 29.5 30.6 81.7 1 106 17.6 18.3 100.0 Total 578 96.4 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 22 3.6 Total 600 100.0

Please rate the performance of government in providing the following services on a scale of one to five, where one means "poor" and five means "excellent": Flood control Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 109 18.1 19.0 19.0 4 185 30.9 32.3 51.4 3 185 30.8 32.3 83.7 2 59 9.8 10.3 94.0 1 35 5.8 6.0 100.0 Total 572 95.4 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 28 4.6 Total 600 100.0   Please rate the performance of government in providing the following services on a scale of one to five, where one means "poor" and five means "excellent": Budget management Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 30 5.0 5.1 5.1 4 82 13.6 13.8 18.9 3 208 34.7 35.3 54.3 2 141 23.5 23.9 78.2 1 128 21.4 21.8 100.0 Total 589 98.3 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 10 1.7 Total 600 100.0

Please rate the performance of government in providing the following services on a scale of one to five, where one means "poor" and five means "excellent": Communicate Clark County's views about Yucca Mountain to federal decision makers Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 66 11.0 11.6 11.6 4 97 16.2 17.0 28.5 3 181 30.1 31.6 60.1 2 125 20.8 21.8 81.9 1 104 17.3 18.1 100.0 Total 572 95.4 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 27 4.6 Total 600 100.0   Please rate the performance of government in providing the following services on a scale of one to five, where one means "poor" and five means "excellent": Monitor and report to the public on how well government services are being performed Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 26 4.3 4.4 4.4 4 61 10.1 10.4 14.8 3 208 34.6 35.5 50.3 2 180 30.0 30.8 81.0 1 111 18.5 19.0 100.0 Total 585 97.5 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 15 2.5 Total 600 100.0

Please rate the performance of government in providing the following services on a scale of one to five, where one means "poor" and five means "excellent": Water conservation programs Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 83 13.9 14.1 14.1 4 191 31.8 32.2 46.3 3 159 26.6 26.9 73.2 2 87 14.5 14.7 87.9 1 71 11.9 12.1 100.0 Total 592 98.7 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 8 1.3 Total 600 100.0   Please rate the performance of government in providing the following services on a scale of one to five, where one means "poor" and five means "excellent": Providing child protection services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 39 6.5 6.8 6.8 4 104 17.4 18.0 24.7 3 233 38.8 40.1 64.8 2 134 22.4 23.1 87.9 1 70 11.7 12.1 100.0 Total 580 96.8 100.0